Reproducibility of blood tests of liver fibrosis in clinical practice.

Calès P, Veillon P, Konaté A, Mathieu E, Ternisien C

Abstract

Objectives

To evaluate the inter-laboratory reproducibility of blood test for liver fibrosis: FibroMeter, Fibrotest, APRI and their composites variables.

Design And Methods

Four studies, including 147 patients, were performed: study #1 included 2 metachronous blood samples and 2 laboratories; studies #2, #3 and #4 included synchronous samples with assays delayed at day 1 in 12 laboratories, at day 0 in 10 laboratories and at day 0 or 1 in 2 laboratories, respectively. Agreement was evaluated by the intraclass correlation coefficient (r(ic)).

Results

In studies #1, #2 and #4, r(ic) for FibroMeter was 0.893, 0.942 and 0.991, respectively. In study #3, the r(ic) were: FibroMeter: 0.963, Fibrotest: 0.984, APRI: 0.949. Large simulated variations in composite variables had a weak impact on FibroMeter.

Conclusions

When blood marker limits are controlled, inter-laboratory agreement of blood tests is excellent in clinical practice conditions. Blood tests are robust against the variability of composite blood variables.

MeSH — NLM indexing Adult Aged Female Humans Liver Cirrhosis / blood Liver Cirrhosis / diagnosis Liver Cirrhosis / pathology Liver Function Tests Male Middle Aged Observer Variation Reproducibility of Results